Serum NT-proBNP levels in predicting severity of COVID19 infection

Background: Patients with COVID commonly have mild symptoms or even be asymptomatic, a notable proportion of patients may develop severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiorgan failure and, death. NT-proBNP reflects haemodynamic stress and has proven useful for risk stratification in heart failure (HF) and other conditions such as pulmonary embolism and pneumonia. NT-proBNP is an important biomarker for the diagnosis and estimation of prognosis in cardiac insufficiency. Therefore, in the current study, we are aiming to investigate the association between the serum NT pro BNP levels in covid-19 patients and to correlate the same with the severity of COVID-19 infection. Methods: A cohort study involving 68 covid patients whose NT pro BNP levels was estimated at the time of admission and compared with other covid biomarkers. Patients classified as moderate and severe according to ICMR guidelines were included. Serum NTproBNP levels & other covid biomarkers like CRP, IL6, Ddimer, Ferritin, LDH were estimated. Results: Serum NT pro BNP levels were high in severely ill covid patients compared to moderately ill covid 19 patients and was found statistically significant. Serum NT pro BNP levels was positively correlating with other biomarkers. Mortality rate of 4.41% was reported. Conclusion: Serum NT-proBNP levels of COVID 19 patients can be used to predict the prognosis of covid which can help in early diagnosis and management of complications.

Platelet Indices and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as Markers for Predicting COVID-19 Infection Severity

Background Novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (or coronavirus disease 2019;COVID-19) has caused a large number of infections across the globe. Numerous markers are being used to predict the severity of infection. This study was undertaken to assess the utility of platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as markers of severity and mortality among patients with COVID-19 infection. Methodology This is a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care center in India from April 2021 to June 2021. Patients admitted with COVID-19 infection were included in the study. Based on the severity, patients were categorized into the mild and severe (moderate severity included) groups. Platelet count, MPV, PDW, and PLR done at admission were studied and correlated with the disease severity and mortality. Statistics The independent t-test was used to compare the variables. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was done to identify the cut-off value. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18 software (SPSS Inc. Released 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc). Results One hundred patients admitted with COVID-19 infection were studied. 51 patients had a mild and 49 had a severe infection. The mean PLR was 141.40 among patients with mild illness and 252.6 with severe infection (P<0.001). The mean PLR among survivors was 104.4 (SD-23.56) and among nonsurvivors was 302.78 (SD-34.5) (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to platelet count, MPV, and PDW. Conclusion PLR was found to be a reliable marker of severity and mortality among patients with COVID-19 illness.

Mucormycosis of the Breast in a Patient With Breast Carcinoma After COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Mucormycosis is a rare, but potentially fatal, fungal infection which is caused by mucormyctes. These forms of fungi are typically known to infect immuno-compromised individuals but are rare in immunocompetent individuals. Herein, we report the case of a 52 year-old female who was diagnosed with right breast carcinoma in Manipal Hospital, a tertiary cancer care center. The patient was a known diabetic and hypertensive and who had recently recovered from coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. In the due course of management, she developed mucormycosis infection at the operative site in her right breast where she had a radiation therapy-induced wound. This patient was successfully treated with an aggressive regimen of early surgical debridement along with administration of systemic amphotericin B.

Diagnosis and Management of Myocarditis in Children: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Myocarditis remains a clinical challenge in pediatrics. Originally, it was recognized at autopsy before the application of endomyocardial biopsy, which led to a histopathology-based diagnosis such as in the Dallas criteria. Given the invasive and low-sensitivity nature of endomyocardial biopsy, its diagnostic focus shifted to a reliance on clinical suspicion. With the advances of cardiac magnetic resonance, an examination of the whole heart in vivo has gained acceptance in the pursuit of a diagnosis of myocarditis. The presentation may vary from minimal symptoms to heart failure, life-threatening arrhythmias, or cardiogenic shock. Outcomes span full resolution to chronic heart failure and the need for heart transplantation with inadequate clues to predict the disease trajectory. The American Heart Association commissioned this writing group to explore the current knowledge and management within the field of pediatric myocarditis. This statement highlights advances in our understanding of the immunopathogenesis, new and shifting dominant pathogeneses, modern laboratory testing, and use of mechanical circulatory support, with a special emphasis on innovations in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Despite these strides forward, we struggle without a universally accepted definition of myocarditis, which impedes progress in disease-targeted therapy.

Impact of lockdown and unlocking on symptomatology and emergency department visits during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a complete nationwide lockdown on March 24, 2020. The months of April and May had stringent lockdown measures followed by a gradual loosening of restrictions in a graded manner. Methods: This observational study was performed in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital in south India triage Priority 1 and Priority 2 patients presented during the COVID-19 lockdown and unlock periods spanning from April 2020 to August 2020. The three different lockdown periods and the subsequent unlock periods were categorized as lockdown 1 (LD1), lockdown 2 (LD2), lockdown 3 (LD3), and unlock phase (UL), and a 7-day time period in each were taken for 7-day incidence analysis. Results: During the 5-month study period, a total of 1,954 patients were analyzed for the study that included 405, 440, 492, and 617 patients during the 7-day time periods in the LD1, LD2, LD3, and UL periods, respectively. The 7-day incidence of COVID-19 suspects increased significantly by 101.9% from LD1 to UL phases, whereas trauma cases increased by 52.9% in the same two time periods. Compared with LD1, in the UL phase, the 7-day ED admission and in-hospital mortality rates increased by 50.3% and 66.7%, respectively. Conclusion: The number of COVID-19 suspects saw a near-constant increase through the different phases of lockdown, culminating in the UL phase. The stringent lockdown measures resulted in a significant reduction in the incidence of trauma with a rebound increase in the UL phase.

Shared Decision Making in Cardiac Transplantation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient Refusal of Transplantation.

Shared decision making with patients in advanced heart failure is critical when making decisions on therapies such as left ventricular assist device implantation and cardiac transplantation. We describe a case wherein the risks of coronavirus disease-2019 affected the decision of a patient regarding proceeding with cardiac transplantation. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

Adaptations and Safety Modifications to Perform Safe Minimal Access Surgery (Minimally Invasive Surgery: Laparoscopy and Robotic) during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

It is inevitable that some patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 may require urgent surgical procedures. The objective of this review was to discuss the modifications required in the operating room during COVID-19 times for minimal access, laparoscopy, and robotic surgery, especially with regard to minimally invasive surgical instruments, buffalo filter, trocars with smoke evacuator, and special personal protection equipment. We have discussed the safety measures to be followed for the suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patient. In addition to surgical patients, health care workers should also protect themselves by following the guidelines and recommendations while treating these patients. Although there is little evidence of viral transmission through laparoscopic or open approaches, we recommend modifications to surgical practice such as the use of safe smoke evacuation and minimizing energy device use to reduce the risk of exposure to aerosolized particles to the health care team. Therefore, hospitals must follow specific protocols and arrange suitable training of the health care workers. Following well-established plans to accomplish un-deferrable surgeries in COVID-19-positive patients is strongly recommended.

Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Smoke, Decoding Fear and Ensuring Safety: Adaptations and Safety Modifications During COVID Pandemic.

The most fearful word starting from C, Cancer has now been replaced with COVID-19 owing to its associated physical, emotional and financial hardships as well as its social stigma. Never before we as medical fraternity been challenged to take care of patients and at the same time consider the safety of ourselves, family members and our fellow healthcare workers. Emotions and fear-driven treatments that are otherwise inefficacious may contribute to a false sense of security, unwarranted side-effects, divert resources and delay research into treatments that may actually work. Decoding fear with available evidence i.e. practicing evidence-based medicine will guide us in better handling of situations in this pandemic. The objective of this review is to discuss the modifications required in the operating theatre during COVID-19 times for minimal access, laparoscopy and robotic surgery, especially with regard to the handling of surgical smoke, minimally invasive surgical instruments, trocars with smoke evacuator and special personal protection equipment. Although there is no evidence of viral transmission through laparoscopic or open approaches, we recommend modifications to surgical practice such as the use of safe smoke evacuation and minimizing energy device use. We have come up with Rule of 20 for 2020 pandemic in operation theatres and modification of trocar for safe handling of surgical smoke in MIS which can be used in resource-limited settings. Hospitals must follow specific protocols and arrange suitable training of the healthcare workers. We believe that "Fears are educated into us, and can, if we wish, be educated out".